Polkassembly Logo

OpenGov
View All Big Tipper

Vibly Short-Term Repayable Bridge Funding Request

inBig Tipper
35 days ago
Rejected

Vibly is a Polkadot ecosystem project aiming to build an AI-era agent social collaboration network. The Vibly testnet is already live, the core protocol design and overall workflow have largely been completed, and the next stage is preparation for the incentivized testnet.

This proposal requests 8,500 USDT in short-term repayable bridge funding to support Vibly’s minimum development, operations, and market preparation during the transition from testnet to incentivized testnet.

This is a repayable funding request with interest. If the proposal is approved, the borrower will repay the full principal and pay interest according to the agreed terms.

Background

I have been working full-time in the Polkadot ecosystem for close to one year. In April, I completed the main development work for Jambda M1, a JAM protocol client. Jambda has passed JAM conformance testing and is currently waiting for the subsequent interview process.

After completing Jambda, we began building actual Polkadot ecosystem products. Our long-term direction has consistently been to explore how Polkadot can become infrastructure for the AI era.

During this process, we explored several directions, including running LLMs in PVM and building an AI agent social network protocol, as well as researching how to connect Polkadot to machine-payment scenarios. However, during this research, we found that for protocols such as X402, the community already had relevant products, and the surrounding developer ecosystem was relatively complete, but these products had not received further promotion or maintenance.

Through these explorations, we realized that the broader Web3 ecosystem is facing a growth trap: because there has long been a lack of truly valuable applications, users continue to leave, developers lose motivation to build and maintain products, and this further accelerates user loss.

Therefore, we need products that can generate real value even without an existing user base. In terms of user experience, we also need to ensure that users can participate easily even if they have no prior Web3 knowledge.

Vibly

Vibly is a vision realization network. It decentralizes large-scale agent coordination in order to advance, with higher efficiency, visions that previously could only be pursued by large companies spending significant resources.

Vibly does not need to form large-scale network effects in its early stage in order to create value. Even with only a small number of agents and users, it can support long-term collaboration around a vision and produce real value.

We have published two community posts that describe Vibly in a restrained, non-marketing-oriented way:

  • Vibly Phase 0 Testnet “Lumen” Is Live
  • Vibly: An Open Intelligence Network for Large-Scale AI Collaboration

At present, the Vibly Phase 0 testnet is already live, and the protocol workflow has been largely validated. The current testnet stage mainly focuses on verifying whether the product logic, collaboration mechanism, and overall workflow can operate stably.

We are also exploring ecosystem application scenarios in parallel.

VibMath

VibMath is a basic science application built on Vibly’s collaboration mechanism. Its core workflow is already running stably. After the Vibly incentivized testnet goes live, VibMath will continue to operate as a real-world scenario validation platform, providing Vibly with continuous product feedback, user behavior data, and collaboration mechanism validation.

You can view its operating flow here:

  • Vibly Console - VibMath Organization

Advent

Advent is another practical application in the Vibly ecosystem, planned to launch alongside the incentivized testnet.

Advent aims to connect agent network collaboration with real-world product design, production, and sales, creating actual consumer goods similar to LABUBU-style trendy IP derivatives. Once completed, consumers will be able to use DOT to purchase creative goods coordinated and led by agents and produced by human factories, laying the foundation for more complex electronic products in the future.

We will introduce its detailed design and full workflow soon.

Bridge Funding

Our original plan was to use future JAM Prize funding to support Vibly’s continued development and operations until Vibly itself becomes profitable. However, after communicating with the official process, we learned that the interview is expected to take place no earlier than late August. Considering the subsequent procedures, we need to conservatively estimate that the actual funding arrival time may be around October. This process is reasonable, as there are still multiple teams ahead of us waiting for interviews.

The problem is that this timeline has exceeded our initial expectations. After the Vibly testnet went live, the project entered a higher-cost stage. The first phase of Vibly adopted a rapid prototyping approach, which allowed us to validate and launch quickly. In the next stage, we need to refactor the core protocol and product. In addition, we need to continue maintaining the testnet and product development, while also beginning market promotion, community communication, and incentivized testnet preparation.

Under the current circumstances, we originally had to choose between two undesirable options:

  1. Launch the incentivized testnet quickly;
  2. Pause development and operations while waiting for future funding.

The first option may bring unnecessary security, operational, and reputational risks. Although the incentivized testnet stage usually would not cause substantial user asset losses, a rushed launch may still consume the long-term value of both the project and the ecosystem.

The second option would create a gap of several months. For an early-stage product, testnet continuity, product rhythm, and market rhythm are decisive factors. In the age of AI-assisted development, execution windows are being significantly compressed, making speed and continuity increasingly important.

We fully understand that, as a project with predictable profitability, Vibly should not rely on treasury support and should develop in a market-oriented way as much as possible. However, considering the special market conditions and the fact that we have a predictable source of funds sufficient to cover this request, we have ultimately decided to request a small, repayable, interest-bearing bridge fund from the Polkadot Treasury to maintain the minimum continuity required for Vibly’s transition from testnet to incentivized testnet.

Requested Amount

The requested amount is:

8,500 USDT

This funding will be used for Vibly’s minimum development and operations, including but not limited to:

  1. Testnet infrastructure maintenance;
  2. Product development required for the incentivized testnet, including refactoring of the core protocol and Vibly Chain;
  3. Advent launch preparation and validation;
  4. Documentation, user onboarding, and test feedback organization;
  5. Early market promotion and community operations.

Repayment Terms

This proposal is a repayable funding request. If approved, the borrower will repay the principal and interest to the treasury.

Taking into account Polkadot’s current staking yield, the time cost of capital, and the credit risk borne by the community, this proposal sets the annual interest rate at 9%, calculated as simple interest.

The interest formula is:

Interest = Principal × Annual Interest Rate × Actual Borrowing Days / 365

The actual borrowing period starts from the day the funds are successfully paid out to the receiving address and ends on the day the repayment transaction is completed.

The repayment arrangement is as follows:

  1. If Vibly obtains external financing or project revenue during this period, this loan will be repaid first;
  2. If JAM Prize funding is received, the principal and interest will be repaid within one week after the funds arrive;
  3. Regardless of whether the expected funds arrive, the final repayment date will be no later than 2026-12-31.

The repayment address will be the same as the receiving address.

Risk Disclosure

This proposal is not risk-free. From the community’s perspective, the main risks include:

  1. JAM Prize process risk: Jambda has passed conformance testing, but it still needs to complete the interview and subsequent procedures before the related funding can be finally confirmed.
  2. Repayment risk: Repayment depends on the borrower’s actual ability and willingness to repay.

These risks are real. Therefore, we acknowledge that the community is taking limited credit risk, and we price this risk through interest.

Track

This proposal will be submitted through the Big Tipper track, mainly based on the following considerations:

  1. Traceable prior work: Vibly already has traceable early-stage work. Although the project is not yet mature enough to be fully evaluated as a mature project, this proposal uses a repayable structure, and therefore we have decided to use this track.

  2. Time sensitivity: Vibly is at a critical stage. A long funding cycle may not solve the current problem and may instead interrupt development and operational rhythm, or force the project to enter the next stage too quickly before it is sufficiently prepared.

  3. Clear repayment boundary: We have already passed JAM conformance testing. Therefore, the repayment source of this proposal does not entirely depend on Vibly’s future financing or revenue, but has a relatively predictable external funding source.

Transparency Commitment

If the proposal is approved, I will regularly provide public updates on:

  1. Product development progress;
  2. Testnet operation status;
  3. Incentivized testnet preparation;
  4. VibMath operation status;
  5. Advent development and launch progress;
  6. Fund usage and repayment progress.

Relevant Links

Vibly Products

  • Vibly Website: https://vibly.network/
  • Vibly Console: https://console.vibly.network/
  • Vibly Library: https://library.vibly.network/
  • Vibly Documentation: https://docs.vibly.network/
  • GitHub Organization: https://github.com/ArcheLabs

Core Repositories

The following are Vibly’s main public repositories, used to demonstrate the project’s actual development progress and technical composition:

  • Concord: Vibly’s underlying open collaboration protocol framework, used to abstract tasks, observations, reviews, incentives, and collaboration flows, providing foundational modules for agent coordination and value distribution in the Vibly network.

  • Vibly Chain: The chain-side implementation of the Vibly network, supporting the testnet, on-chain state, incentive mechanisms, and network operation.

  • Vibly Coordinator: The Vibly coordinator service, used to connect on-chain state, agent behavior, task flows, and external services. It is a core backend component in the agent collaboration workflow.

  • Vibly Client: The agent client, used to allow agents to connect to the Vibly network and participate in observation, collaboration, review, and other protocol flows.

  • Vibly Console: Vibly’s user console, used to display network status, user interactions, agent onboarding, task/collaboration flows, and testnet-related functions.

  • Vibly E2E Lab: Vibly’s end-to-end testing and scenario experiment repository, used to validate the complete collaboration flow among agents, the coordinator, the chain, the indexer, and scenario applications.

Community Discussions

  • Vibly Phase 0 Testnet “Lumen” Is Live
  • Vibly: An Open Intelligence Network for Large-Scale AI Collaboration
  • ArcheLabs Progress Report: Laying the Infrastructure for AI on Polkadot

Comments (2)

35 days ago

This proposal asks the Treasury to act as a lender, yet it provides no clear information regarding collateral, legal enforceability, default procedures, or recovery mechanisms.

If repayment ultimately depends on goodwill alone, how is this different from an unsecured grant with a promise attached?

Why should DOT holders accept credit risk for only 9% interest when the downside appears to be a 100% loss of principal?

34 days ago

@16Uv...UbJa You are right that it is necessary for the community to remain cautious. In fact, if the community ultimately rejects this proposal, we would not be too surprised. But as ArcheLabs, we are trying to find a more reasonable solution under the current circumstances.

Regarding the points you raised, I would like to clarify the following:

  1. I agree that this is not equivalent to a traditional loan with full collateral and legal recovery mechanisms. Therefore, the community needs to assess the credit risk involved. However, the repayment constraint does not rely solely on goodwill. ArcheLabs will continue to participate in multiple JAM milestones over the coming years, so reputation, future milestone participation, and community trust are also important constraints.
  2. The 9% interest is not intended as a way for the Treasury to generate high returns. It is more of a repayment constraint to encourage the borrower to repay as soon as possible.
  3. For the community, I believe this is still a useful experiment. Compared with traditional grants, this kind of funding model with an agreed repayment mechanism may help reduce the incentive bias toward building for grants rather than building for the market.

Of course, whether to accept this risk should ultimately be decided by the community. Regardless of the outcome, we will continue building.

34 days ago

If Gavin says it's OK, I'll vote AYE.

Polkassembly is now a read-only archive. Commenting is disabled.

Requested

USDT
8.50K USDT

Proposal Failed

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

Polkassembly · Archived 2026 · polkassembly.io

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy