.

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our third vote on this proposal is NAY. Below is the evaluation of our voting policy v0.3 on this referendum:

SMALL SPENDER
-------------
8 available members
🟢 0 • 🔴 3 • ⚪️ 0
✓ ≥37.5% required participation met
✘ Ayes ≤50.0% of non-abstain votes
▶ Aye/abstain conditions not met
🔴 NAY

Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The referendum concerned a proposal with a flawed preimage stemming from an error in the future block calculation for the AH migration, which led to a miscalculated payout date on Polkassembly. The proposal had indicated that a new preimage and a revised version would be provided soon. Comments were made that reflected a clear disapproval of the proposal, with some participants succinctly stating their opposition and others offering no further explanation. The overall stance was against the proposal, and the expressed dissent highlighted concerns regarding the technical miscalculation and its impact on the planned payout schedule.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort V Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate